Synthesis and Application of Electrospun Nickel-Molybdenum/Graphene Composite Nanofibers and Nickel-Molybdenum Nanofibers Supported on Graphene Nanosheets Catalysts for Hydrocracking of Heavy Hydrocarbons

Zanjaninejad, Behzad; Noroozi Moghaddam, Amirfarhad; Babatabar, Mokhtar A.; Tavasoli, Ahmad

doi:10.22059/jchpe.2025.381855.1558

Synthesis and Application of Electrospun Nickel-Molybdenum/Graphene Composite Nanofibers and Nickel-Molybdenum Nanofibers Supported on Graphene Nanosheets Catalysts for Hydrocracking of Heavy Hydrocarbons

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Behzad Zanjaninejad

Amirfarhad noroozi Moghaddam

Mokhtar A. Babatabar

Ahmad Tavasoli

University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

10.22059/jchpe.2025.381855.1558

Abstract

Electrospun NiMo/Graphene composite nanofibers (NMGF) and NiMo nanofibers supported on Graphene nanosheets (NMFG) were prepared via the electrospinning technique. Their performance for the hydrocracking of n-hexadecane (n-C₁₆) was compared with the NiMo/Graphene (NMG) synthesized by the conventional impregnation method and commercial NiMo/γ-Al₂O₃ (NMA) catalysts in a fixed-bed reactor. ICP, BET, TEM, FESEM, XRD, and NH₃-TPD tests were used to characterize the produced catalysts. The performance of the catalysts was evaluated based on total conversion and the distribution of liquid products over a continuous reaction period of 120 hours. The uniform dispersion of fibers, high surface area, large pore volume, and stronger acidic sites of NMGF and NMFG catalysts resulted in high percentage conversions of 99.5 and 99.2, respectively. The lighter hydrocarbons were achieved in hydrocracking using nanofibrous catalysts. Furthermore, nanofibrous catalysts produced a more stable catalyst than their counterparts, which suffered from coke production and deactivation of roughly 6% over 120 hours. The obtained results revealed the high potential of fibrous catalysts synthesized via the electrospinning method compared with conventional metal oxide nanoparticles-supported catalysts for hydrocracking heavy oils.

Keywords

Coke

Graphene

Hydrocracking

Molybdenum

Nanofibers

Nickel

Subjects

Reaction engineering

[1] Anis S F, Singaravel G and Hashaikeh R (2017) Electropsun Ni-W/zeolite composite fibers for n- heptane hydrocracking and hydroisomerization. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 200146-154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.07.081.

[2] Anis S F, Singaravel G and Hashaikeh R (2018) Hierarchical nano zeolite-Y hydrocracking composite fibers with highly efficient hydrocracking capability. RSC advances, 830: 16703-16715. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1039/C8RA02662A.

[3] Bouchy C, Hastoy G, Guillon E and Martens J (2009) Fischer-Tropsch waxes upgrading via hydrocracking and selective hydroisomerization. Oil & Gas Science and Technology-Revue de l'IFP, 641: 91-112. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.2516/ogst/2008047.

[4] Chang J, Tsubaki N and Fujimoto K (2001) Elemental sulfur as an effective promoter for the catalytic hydrocracking of Arabian vacuum residue. Fuel, 8011: 1639-1643. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00035-7.

[5] Kayukova G, Mikhailova A, Kosachev I, Feoktistov D A and Vakhin A (2018) Conversion of heavy oil with different chemical compositions under catalytic aquathermolysis with an amphiphilic Fe-Co-Cu catalyst and kaolin. Energy & fuels, 326: 6488-6497. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b00347.

[6] Chuan L, Bin S, Min C, SHANG H-y and QUE G-h (2007) Application of Co-Mo/CNT catalyst in hydro-cracking of Gudao vacuum residue. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 354: 407-411. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-5813(07)60026-7.

[7] Hummers Jr W S and Offeman R E (1958) Preparation of graphitic oxide. Journal of the american chemical society, 806: 1339-1339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01539a017.

[8] Kalbasi R J, Massah A R and Barkhordari Z (2010) An efficient and green approach for the esterification of aromatic acids with various alcohols over H 3 PO 4/TiO 2-ZrO 2. Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society, 318: 2361-2367. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2010.31.8.2361.

[9] Kaminski T, Anis S F, Husein M M and Hashaikeh R (2018) Hydrocracking of athabasca VR using NiO-WO3 zeolite-Based catalysts. Energy & Fuels, 322: 2224-2233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b03754.

[10] Kham-or P, Suwannasom P and Ruangviriyachai C (2016) Effect of agglomerated NiMo HZSM-5 catalyst for the hydrocracking reaction of Jatropha curcas oil. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 3824: 3694-3701. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2016.1166165.

[11] Kim H, Nguyen-Huy C and Shin E W (2014) Macroporous NiMo/alumina catalyst for the hydrocracking of vacuum residue. Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis, 1132: 431-443. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-014-0764-5.

[12] Kim S K, Yoon D, Lee S-C and Kim J (2015) Mo2C/graphene nanocomposite as a hydrodeoxygenation catalyst for producing diesel range hydrocarbons. Acs Catalysis, 56: 3292- 3303. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.5b00335.

[13] Kim Y-S, Yun G-N and Lee Y-K (2014) Novel Ni2P/zeolite catalysts for naphthalene hydrocracking to BTX. Catalysis Communications, 45133-138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2013.11.010.

[14] Lee J, Choi Y, Shin J and Lee J K (2016) Selective hydrocracking of tetralin for light aromatic hydrocarbons. Catalysis Today, 265144-153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2015.09.046.

15] Liang J, Liang Z, Zou R and Zhao Y (2017) Heterogeneous catalysis in zeolites, mesoporous silica, and metal–organic frameworks. Advanced Materials, 2930: 1701139. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201701139.

[16] Liu J, He J, Wang L, Li R, Chen P, Rao X, Deng L, Rong L and Lei J (2016) NiO-PTA supported on ZIF-8 as a highly effective catalyst for hydrocracking of Jatropha oil. Scientific reports, 61: 1-11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23667.

[17] Manrique C, Guzmán A, Pérez-Pariente J, Márquez-Álvarez C and Echavarría A (2016) Vacuum gas- oil hydrocracking performance of Beta zeolite obtained by hydrothermal synthesis using carbon nanotubes as mesoporous template. Fuel, 182236-247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.05.097.

[18] Morel F, Kressmann S, Harlé V and Kasztelan S (1997) Processes and catalysts for hydrocracking of heavy oil and residues. In Studies in surface science and catalysis Vol. 106, pp. 1-16. Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2991(97)80003-1.

[19] Okunev A, Parkhomchuk E V e, Lysikov A I, Parunin P D, Semeykina V and Parmon V N (2015) Catalytic hydroprocessing of heavy oil feedstocks. Russian chemical reviews, 849: 981. https://doi.org/DOI 10.1070/RCR4486.

[20] Park K-C and Ihm S-K (2000) Comparison of Pt/zeolite catalysts for n-hexadecane hydroisomerization. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2032: 201-209. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00490-7.

[21] Purón H, Pinilla J, Suelves I and Millan M (2015) Acid treated carbon nanofibers as catalytic support for heavy oil hydroprocessing. Catalysis Today, 24979-85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2014.09.021.

[22] Rad M R, Rashidi A, Vafajoo L and Rashtchi M (2014) Preparation of Co–Mo supported multi-wall carbon nanotube for hydrocracking of extra heavy oil. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 206: 4298-4303. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2014.01.036.

[23] Rana M S, Sámano V, Ancheyta J and Diaz J (2007) A review of recent advances on process technologies for upgrading of heavy oils and residua. Fuel, 869: 1216-1231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.08.004.

[24] Sahu R, Song B J, Im J S, Jeon Y-P and Lee C W (2015) A review of recent advances in catalytic hydrocracking of heavy residues. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2712-24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2015.01.011.

[25] Subsadsana M, Sansuk S and Ruangviriyachai C (2018) Enhanced liquid biofuel production from crude palm oil over synthesized NiMoW-ZSM-5/MCM-41 catalyst. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 402: 237-243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2017.1411992.

[26] Sun C, Zhan T, Pfeifer P and Dittmeyer R (2017) Influence of Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FTS) and hydrocracking (HC) conditions on the product distribution of an integrated FTS-HC process. Chemical Engineering Journal, 310272-281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.10.118.

[27] Taylor R J and Petty R H (1994) Selective hydroisomerization of long chain normal paraffins. Applied Catalysis A: General, 1191: 121-138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-860X(94)85029-1.

[28] Trépanier M, Tavasoli A, Dalai A K and Abatzoglou N (2009) Co, Ru and K loadings effects on the activity and selectivity of carbon nanotubes supported cobalt catalyst in Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Applied Catalysis A: General, 3532: 193-202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2008.10.061.

[29] Trépanier M, Tavasoli A, Dalai A K and Abatzoglou N (2009) Fischer–Tropsch synthesis over carbon nanotubes supported cobalt catalysts in a fixed bed reactor: Influence of acid treatment. Fuel Processing Technology, 903: 367-374. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2008.10.012.

[30] Upare D P, Park S, Kim M, Jeon Y-P, Kim J, Lee D, Lee J, Chang H, Choi S and Choi W (2017) Selective hydrocracking of pyrolysis fuel oil into benzene, toluene and xylene over CoMo/beta zeolite catalyst. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 46356-363. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.11.004.

[31] Wang X, Xu W, Liu N, Yu Z, Li Y and Qiu J (2015) Synthesis of metallic Ni-Co/graphene catalysts with enhanced hydrodesulfurization activity via a low-temperature plasma approach. Catalysis Today, 256203-208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2015.04.026.

[32] Weiss W, Guibard I and Dastillung R (2018) Process for hydroconverting oil feeds in fixed beds to produce low sulphur fuels. In: Google Patents.

[33] Xing T, Alvarez-Majmutov A and Chen J (2019) Bitumen partial upgrading by mild hydroprocessing in a fixed-bed reactor. Fuel, 235696-702. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.08.058.

[34] Yang L, Wang X, Liu Y, Yu Z, Li R and Qiu J (2017) Layer-dependent catalysis of MoS 2/graphene nanoribbon composites for efficient hydrodesulfurization. Catalysis Science & Technology, 73: 693-702. https://doi.org/DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1039/C6CY02074G.

[35] Yuan L, Wang X, Zhao K, Pan H, Li Q, Yang J and Zhang Z (2017) Effect of reaction temperature and hydrogen donor on the Ni0@ graphene-catalyzed viscosity reduction of extra heavy crude oil. Petroleum Science and Technology, 352: 196-200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10916466.2016.1241805.

[36] Yusefabad E T, Tavasoli A and Zamani Y (2018) Effective catalyst to produce naphtha from vacuum gasoil hydrocracking and discrete lump modeling. Petroleum & Coal, 601. https://doi.org/Corpus ID: 195890031.

[37] Bamdadi M, Bozorg A, Tavasoli A, Shateri S, Andache M (2019) Synthesis of Meso/Macroporous γ‐ Alumina via Aluminum Pellet with Controllable Porosity: Ammonium Bicarbonate Influences through Drying and Calcination Steps. Chemistry Select 4 (19), 5872-5879. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.201900523.

[38] Hashemi H, Behnejad H, Rosendahl, L Tavasoli A (2022) Tuning the porosity and physicochemical properties of SBA-15: RSM-assisted optimizing of traditional sol–gel process , Chemical Papers vol 76, 4541-4560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-022-02187-z.

[39] Salimi M, Tavasoli A, Rosendahl L (2020) Optimization of γ-alumina porosity via response surface methodology: the influence of engineering support on the performance of a residual oil hydrotreating catalyst, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 299, 110124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110124.

[40] LB. Liu, H. Lv, X. Cui, G. Sun, X. Zhang, B. Dong, Y. Li, Y. Pan, Y. Chai, C. Liu, Preparation of presulfided oil-soluble NiMo catalyst for slurry bed hydrocracking of vacuum residue, Chemical Engineering Journal, 498 (15), 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.155166.

[41] D. Dhaneswara, J. Fatriansyah, T. Sudiro, S. Harjanto, M. S. Mastuli, A. Federico, R. Ulfiati, Synthesis and optimization of Ni/Mo-impregnated kaolin-based ZSM-5 as a catalytic hydrocracking catalyst for heavy petroleum distillates, Sustainable Energy & Fuels, 12, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3se01573d.

[42] K.K. Ferreira, C. Di Stasi, A. Ayala-Cortés, L.S. Ribeiro, J.L. Pinilla, I. Suelves, M.F.R. Pereira, Hydroprocessing of waste cooking oil to produce liquid fuels over Ni-Mo and Co-Mo supported on carbon nanotubes, Biomass and Bioenergy, 91, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107480.