Effect of Concentration of Cations on Activated Sludge Properties and Membrane Fouling in Membrane Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment


مهندسی شیمی


This paper presents the results of an investigation on the effects of concentration of cations on activated sludge properties and membrane fouling in submerge membrane bioreactors. The working volume of the experimental setup was two liters. The cellulose acetate membrane was immersed in the bioreactor. The flocculability, settling properties and fouling propensity of activated sludge was measured in various concentrations of cations such as sodium, potassium, magnesium and calcium. Results showed that cations bind with biopolymers and induce flocculation in bioreactors. This phenomenon induced in divalent cations so that flocculability of activated sludge in presence of divalent cations was two-fold of flocculability of activated sludge. On the other hand, cations improve settleability and dewatering properties of activated sludge and especially mitigated membrane fouling, for example, calcium reduced the membrane fouling intensity by 25% of the reference activated sludge.


1- In-Soung, Ch. and Su-Na., K. (2004). “Wastewater treatment using membrane filtration—effect of biosolids
concentration on cake resistance.” Process Biochemistry, Vol. 40, PP. 1307–1314.
2-Sanin, D. and Vsilind, P.A. (2000). “Bioflocculation of activated sludge: The role of calcium ions and
extracellular polymers.” Environmental Technology, Vol.21, PP. 1405-1412.
3- Sombatsompop, K. (2007). Membrane fouling studies in suspended and attached growth membrane bioreactor
systems PhD thesis, Asian Institute of Technology, School of Environment, Resources and Development,
4- Flemming, H.C. and Wingender, J. (2001). Relevance of microbial extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs).
Part I. Structural and Ecological Aspects, Water Science Technology, Vol. 43, PP.1–8.
5- Bruus, J.H., Nielsen, P.H. and Keiding, K., (1992). “On the stability of activated sludge flocs with
implications on dewatering.” Water Research, Vol. 26 , PP.1597-1604.
6 –Urbain, V., Block, J.C. and Manem, J. (1993). “Bioflocculation in activated sludge: Analytical approach.”
Water Research, Vol.27 ,PP. 829-838.
7 – Murthy, S. N. (1998). “Bioflocculation: Implications for activated sludge properties and wastewater
treatment PhD thesis”. Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA.
8- Li, X.Y. and Yang, S.F. (2007). “Influence of loosely bound extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) on the
Flocculation.” Sedimentation and Dewaterability of Activated Sludge, Water Research, Vol. 41, PP. 1022 –
9- Arabi, S.and Nakhla, G. (2008). “Impact of calcium on the membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors.”
Journal of Membrane Science, Vol.314, PP. 134–142.
10- Arabi, S. and Nakhla, G. (2009). Impact of magnesium on membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors.”
Separation and Purification Technology, Vol.67, PP. 319-325.
11- Arabi, S. and Nakhla, G. (2009). Impact of cation concentrations on fouling in membrane bioreactors.”
Journal of Membrane Science, Vol. 343, PP.110–118.
12- Liu, H., Herbert, H. and Fang, P. (2002), “Extraction of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) of
sludges.” Journal of Biotechnology, Vol. 95, PP. 249–256.
13- Gaudy, A.F. (1962). “Colorimetric determination of protein and carbohydrate.” Industrial Water Wastes,
Vol. 7, PP. 17–22.
14- Bradford, M.M.A. (1976). “Rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of
protein utilizing the principle of protein dyebinding.” Analytical Biochemistry, Vol.72, PP. 248–254.
15- Jin, B., Wilén, B. M. and Lant, P. (2003). “A comprehensive insight into floc characteristics and their impact
on compressibility and settleability of activated sludge.” Chemical Engineering Journa,l Vol. 95, PP. 221–
16- APHA, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed., American Public Health
Association, Baltimore, MD, 1999.
17- Ji, J., Qiu, J., Wai, N., Wong, F. S., and Li, Y. (2010). “Influence of organic and inorganic flocculants on
physical–chemical properties of biomass and membrane-fouling rate.” Water Research, Vol.44, PP. 1627-
18- Ng, H. Y., Ong, S. L. and Ng, W. J. (2005). “Effects of sodium chloride on the performance of a sequencing
batch reactor.” Journal of Environmental Engineering, Vol. 131, PP. 1557-1564.
19- Higgins, M. J., Sobeck, D. C., Owens, S. J. and Szabo L. M. (2004). “Case study II: Application of the
divalent cation bridging theory to improve biofloc properties and industrial activated sludge system
performance using alternatives to sodium-based chemicals.” Water Environment Research, Vol.76, PP. 353-
20- Sheng, G. P., Yu, H. Q. and Li, X.Y. Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) of microbial aggregates in
biological wastewater treatment systems: A review, Biotechnology Advances in Press.
21- Kim, I. S. and Jang, N. (2006). “The effect of calcium on the membrane biofouling in the membrane
bioreactor (MBR).” Water Research, Vol. 40, PP. 2756 – 2764.
22- Flemming, H.C., Schaule, G., Griebe, T., Schmitt, J. and Tamachkiarowa, A. (1997). “Biofouling-the
achilles heel of membrane processes.” Desalination Vol. 113, PP. 215–225.
23- Wang, Z., Wu, Z. and Tang, S. (2009). “Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) properties and their
effects on membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor.” Water Research, Vol. 43, PP. 2504-
24- Sobeck, D. C., and Higgins, M. J. (2002). “Examination of three theories for mechanisms of cation-induced
bioflocculation.” Water Research, Vol. 36, PP. 527–538