# The Heinemann-Mittermeir Generalized Shape Factor and Its Practical Relevance

Document Type : Original Paper

Authors

Leoben Mining University, Austria

Abstract

Fifty years ago Warren and Root have introduced the shape factor. This fundamental parameter for modeling of naturally fractured reservoirs has been discussed stormily ever since. Different definitions for shape factor have been suggested which all of them are heuristically based. Recently, Heinemann and Mittermeir mathematically derived - based on the dual-continuum theorem assuming pseudo-steady state condition- a general and proper form of the shape factor formula which can be simplified to the previously published shape factor definitions. This paper discusses the practical relevance of the Heinemann-Mittermeir formula. Its difference to the most commonly used Kazemi et al.formula is its demonstration by fine-scale single matrix block simulation. Furthermore, it is shown that the generally applied isotropy assumption can lead to significantly wrong results. Consequently, the generalized Heinemann-Mittermeir shape factor formula is recommended to be routinely practiced in the industry for more accurate results. The paper tries to present a proper realization of the nature of the shape factor as well as presentation of detailed mathematical and practical approaches for measuring all the required values in order to determine the shape factor for individual matrix rock pieces from outcrops of fractured formations. Performing those measurements routinely is regarded as essential parameter for its usability.

Keywords

#### References

[1] Barenblatt, G. J., Zheltov, I. P. and Kochina, I. N. (1960). "Basic concepts in the theory of seepage of homogeneous liquids in fissured rocks." J. Appl. Math. Mech., Vol. 24, pp. 1286-1303.
[2] Warren, J.E. and Root, P.J. (1963). The Behavior of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs, SPE Journal, (Sept.1963), 245-255.
[3] Kazemi, H., Merrill, L.S., Porterfield, K.L. and Zeman, P.R. (1976). Numerical Simulation of Water-Oil Flow in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs, SPE Journal, 317-326.
[4] Coats, K.H. (1989). Implicit Compositional Simulation of Single-Porosity and Dual-Porosity Reservoirs. SPE paper 18427.
[5] Quintard, M. and Whitaker, S. (1996). "Theoretical development of region-averaged equations for slightly compressible single-phase flow." Adv. Water Res., Vol. 19(1), pp. 29-47.
[6] Zimmerman, R.W., Chen, G., Hadgu, T. and Bodvarsson, G.S. (1993). "A numerical dual-porosity model with semi-analytical treatment of fracture/matrix flow." Wat. Resour. Res., Vol. 29(7), pp. 2127-2137.
[7] Mathias, S.A. and Zimmerman, R.W. (2003). Laplace transform inversion for late-time behavior of groundwater flow problems. Water Resources Research, 39(10): paper 1283.
[8] Kazemi, H., Gilman, J.R. and Elsharkawy, A.M. (1992). Analytical and Numerical Solution of Oil Recovery from Fractured Reservoirs Using Empirical Transfer Functions, SPE Reservoir Engineering, May 1992, 219-227
[9] Heinemann, Z.E. and Mittermeir, G.M. (2012). "Derivation of the Kazemi-Gilman-Elsharkawy generalized dual porosity shape factor." Transp. Porous Med., Vol. 91(1), pp. 123-132.
[10] de Swaan, A. (1976). Analytic Solutions for Determining Naturally Fracture Reservoir Properties by Well Testing. SPE Paper, 5346-PA.
[11] de Swaan, A. (1990). Influence of Shape and Skin of Matrix-Rock Blocks on Pressure Transients in Fractured Reservoirs. SPE Formation Evaluation, Dec. 1990, 344-352.
[12] Sarma, P. and Aziz, K. (2006). Production Optimization With Adjoint Models Under Nonlinear ControlState Path Inequality Constraints. SPE Paper, 99959-MS.
[13] Lim, KT. And Aziz, K. (1995). "Matrix-fracture transfer shape factors for dual-porosity simulators." J. Pet. Sci. Eng, Vol. 13, pp. 169-178.
[14] Schlumberger, (2012). ECLIPSE reservoir simulation software – Technical Description Version 2012.1.
[15] Barker, J.A. (1985). "Block-geometry functions characterizing transport in densely fissured media." J. Hydrol., Vol. 77, pp. 263-279.
[16] Dunham, W. (1990). Heron's Formula for Triangular Area. Ch. 5 in Journey through Genius: The Great Theorems of Mathematics. New York: Wiley, pp. 113-132.
[17] Wolfram Math World, http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Point-PlaneDistance.html
[18] Lishman, J.R. (1970). Core Permeability Anisotropy, J. Canadian Pet. Tech., 9(2).
[19] Mousatov, A., Pervago, E. and Shevnin, V. (2000). A New Approach to Resistivity Anisotropy Measurements, SEG 2000 Expanded Abstracts, 2000-1381.
[20] Durlofsky, L.J. (1991). "Numerical calculation of equivalent grid block permeability tensors for heterogeneous porous media." Wat. Resou. Res., Vol. 27(5), pp. 699-708.
[21] Rose, W. (1982). "A new method to measure directional permeability." J. Petrol. Technol., May 1982. 22- Walter D., R. (1982). "A new method to measure directional permeability." J. Petrol. Eng., Vol. 34(5), pp. 1142-1144.
[23] Weitzenböck, J.R., Shenoi, R.A. and Wilson, P.A. (1997). "Measurement of three-dimensional permeability." Appl. Sci. Manuf., Vol. 29, pp. 159-169.
[24] Asadi, M., Ghalambor, A., Rose, W.D. and Shirazi, M. K. (2000). Anisotropic Permeability Measurement of Porous Media: A 3-Dimensional Method. SPE Conference Paper, 59396.
[25] Onsager, L. (1931). "Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes." Phys. Rev. Vol. 37, pp. 405-426.
[26] Anton, H. and Rorres, C. (2000). Elementary Linear Algebra (Applications Version) 8th edition, John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-471-17052-5.
[27] Muskat, M. (1937). The flow of homogeneous fluids through porous media, Mc Graw Hill Book Company Inc., NY, USA, 137-148.
[28] Creative Dimension Software Ltd – 3D Software Modeller Pro.

### History

• Receive Date: 15 January 2013
• Accept Date: 03 March 2014