Simulation Study of Salinity Effect on Polymer Flooding in Core Scale

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Faculty of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, Sahand Oil and Gas Research Institute (SOGRI), Sahand University of Technology, Sahand New Town, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

In this study, simulation of low salinity polymer flooding in the core scale is investigated using Eclipse-100 simulator. For this purpose, two sets of data are used. The first set of data were adopted from the results of experimental studies conducted at the University of Bergen, performed using Berea sandstone and intermediate oil. The second data set, related to sand pack and heavy oil system, was obtained from experiments performed at Sahand Oil and Gas Research Institute. To obtain relative permeability and capillary pressure curves, automatic history matching is implemented by coupling Eclipse-100 and MATLAB software. Three different correlations are used for relative permeability. The parameters of each model are calculated using four different optimization algorithms, including Levenberg-Marquardt, Trust-region, Fminsearch, and Pattern search. The results showed that regardless of the optimization algorithm being used, applying relative permeability model of Lomeland et al., known as LET model, best matches the experimental oil recovery data in comparison with those of Corey and Skjeaveland et al.’s relative permeability correlations. The LET model and the Trust-region algorithm were selected for simulation of low salinity polymer flooding process. Simulation of the first set of data showed that using low salinity water flooding before polymer flooding, oil recovery was increased about 16%. In addition, using the second set of data, simulation of low salinity polymer flooding scenario is investigated in a long core model, taken from one of the southwestern fields of Iran. Simulation results show an increase of about 34% in the recovery of low salinity polymer flooding compared to the water flooding scenario.  

Keywords

References

[1]     Shiran BS. Enhanced Oil Recovery by Combined Low Salinity Water and Polymer Flooding. [Ph.D. dissertation]. Bergen: University of Bergen; 2014.
[2]     Ayirala SC, Uehara-Nagamine E, Matzakos AN, Chin RW, Doe PH, van den Hoek PJ. A designer water process for offshore low salinity and polymer flooding applications. InSPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium 2010 Jan 1.
[3]     Vermolen EC, Pingo-Almada M, Wassing BM, Ligthelm DJ, Masalmeh SK. Low-salinity polymer flooding: improving polymer flooding technical feasibility and economics by using low-salinity make-up brine. International Petroleum Technology Conference. 2014 Jan 19.
[4]     Mohammadi H, Jerauld G. Mechanistic modeling of the benefit of combining polymer with low salinity water for enhanced oil recovery. InSPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium 2012 Jan 1.
[5]     Algharaib M, Alajmi A, Gharbi R. Improving polymer flood performance in high salinity reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2014 Mar 1;115:17-23.
[6]     Chandrashegaran P. Low Salinity Water Injection for EOR. InSPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition 2015 Aug 4.
[7]     Al-Sawafi MS. Simulation of enhanced heavy oil recovery: history match of waterflooding and polymer injection at adverse mobility ratio. [Master's thesis]. Bergen: University of Bergen; 2015.
[8]     Torrijos ID, Puntervold T, Strand S, Austad T, Bleivik TH, Abdullah HI. An experimental study of the low salinity Smart Water-Polymer hybrid EOR effect in sandstone material. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2018 May 1;164:219-29.
[9]     Unsal E, Ten Berge AB, Wever DA. Low salinity polymer flooding: Lower polymer retention and improved injectivity. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2018 Apr 1;163:671-82.
[10]  Shaker Shiran B, Skauge A. Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) by combined low salinity water/polymer flooding. Energy & Fuels. 2013 Mar 6;27(3):1223-35.
[11]  Shaker Shiran B, Skauge A. Wettability and oil recovery by low salinity injection. InSPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia 2012 Jan 1.
[12]  Basbug B. Analysis of spontaneous imbibition in fractured, heterogeneous sandstone. [Doctoral dissertation]. State College: Penn State University; 2008.
[13]  Lee CH. Parametric study of factors affecting capillary imbibition in fractured porous media. [Doctoral dissertation]. State College: Penn State University; 2010.
[14]  Sayyafzadeh M. Uncertainty reduction in reservoir characterisation through inverse modelling of dynamic data: an evolutionary computation approach. [Doctoral dissertation]. Adelaide: University of Adelaide; 2013.
[15]  Xu S. Automatic history match and upscaling study of VAPEX process and its uncertainty analysis. [Doctoral dissertation]. Regina: University of Regina; 2012.
[16]  Sun X, Mohanty KK. Estimation of flow functions during drainage using genetic algorithm. SPE Journal. 2005 Dec 1;10(04):449-57.
[17]  Corey AT. The interrelation between gas and oil relative permeabilities. Producers monthly. 1954 Nov;19(1):38-41.
[18]  Skjaeveland SM, Siqveland LM, Kjosavik A, Hammervold WL, Virnovsky GA. Capillary pressure correlation for mixed-wet reservoirs. InSPE India Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition 1998 Jan 1.
[19]  Burdine N. Relative permeability calculations from pore size distribution data. Journal of Petroleum Technology. 1953 Mar;5(3):71-8.
[20]  Standing MB. Notes on relative permeability relationships. unpublished report, Division of Petroleum Engineering and Applied Geophysics, The Norwegian Institute of Technology, The University of Trondheim. 1974 Aug.
[21]  Lomeland F, Ebeltoft E, Thomas WH. A new versatile relative permeability correlation. InInternational Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, Toronto, Canada 2005 Aug 21.
Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering
Volume 53, Issue 2
December 2019
Pages 137-152

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 03 May 2018
  • Revise Date: 16 August 2019
  • Accept Date: 02 September 2019

Share

How to cite

Statistics