Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering

Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering

Techno-Economic Assessment of the AHP Based Selected Method for Separating Formic Acid from an Aqueous Effluent

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
Siamak Alipour 1
Arash Sadeghi 2
Hamid Omidvarborna 3
Asadollah Karimi 4
1 Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of engineering, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, Iran
2 Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, Iran.
3 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom
4 Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Maragheh
10.22059/jchpe.2022.334436.1372
Abstract
Formic acid (FA) is used across the world for a wide variety of applications spanning from chemical production to textile and pharmaceutical industries. FA can be synthesized efficiently from the lignocellulosic biomass constituent carbohydrates by acid hydrolysis in a dilute aqueous reaction media. Since FA forms an azeotrope with water, its purification, water recycle and reuse are vital to establishing a cost-competitive process. In this study, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was implemented to determine the desired separation method for isolating FA from a 3 wt.% aqueous solution by considering the advantages and disadvantages of each process. Four parameters named as scalable, quality of the final product, repeatable, and energy consumption were defined as criteria to perform AHP analysis. Furthermore, six alternative approaches namely (i) azeotropic distillation, (ii) extractive distillation with a liquid solvent and (iii) solid salt, (iv) the combination of liquid solvent and solid salt, (v) pressure-swing distillation, and (vi) liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) were examined to decide the most preferred separation method with respect to the goal, which is the desired separation method. The AHP results indicated that the alternative approach, the LLE and the scalable criteria have the highest preference with 39.4% and 54% priority, respectively. The proposed process based on the alternative approach could extract 99% of FA by using diethyl ether. Moreover, an estimated minimum selling price (MSP) of 2.48 $/kg FA with 97.4% purity was achieved by using techno-economic assessment for a typical plant with 1715 ton/day capacity.
Keywords
Analytic Hierarchy Process
Water Recycle
Formic Acid
Liquid-Liquid Extraction
Techno-Economic Assessment
  1. Alipour S, Omidvarborna H, Kim D-S. A review on synthesis of alkoxymethyl furfural, a biofuel candidate. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017;71:908-26.
  2. Knockaert G. Tellurium and tellurium compounds. Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. 2000.
  3. Wölfel R, Taccardi N, Bösmann A, Wasserscheid P. Selective catalytic conversion of biobased carbohydrates to formic acid using molecular oxygen. Green chemistry. 2011;13(10):2759-63.
  4. Kang S, Fu J, Zhang G. From lignocellulosic biomass to levulinic acid: A review on acid-catalyzed hydrolysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018;94:340-62.
  5. Mika LT, Csefalvay E, Nemeth A. Catalytic conversion of carbohydrates to initial platform chemicals: chemistry and sustainability. Chemical reviews. 2018;118(2):505-613.
  6. Alipour S, Omidvarborna H. Enzymatic and catalytic hybrid method for levulinic acid synthesis from biomass sugars. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017;143:490-6.
  7. Alipour S, Omidvarborna H. High concentration levulinic acid production from corn stover. RSC advances. 2016;6(112):111616-21.
  8. Sprakel L, Schuur B. Solvent developments for liquid-liquid extraction of carboxylic acids in perspective. Separation and purification technology. 2019;211:935-57.
  9. Wang Y, Li H. Complex Chemical Process Evaluation Methods Using a New Analytic Hierarchy Process Model Integrating Deep Residual Network with Multiway Principal Component Analysis. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2019;58(31):13889-99.
  10. Promentilla MAB, Janairo JIB, Yu DEC, Pausta CMJ, Beltran AB, Huelgas-Orbecido AP, et al. A stochastic fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for optimal selection of clean technologies. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018;183:1289-99.
  11. Sagir E, Alipour S. Photofermentative hydrogen production by immobilized photosynthetic bacteria: Current perspectives and challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2021;141:110796.
  12. Torkabadi AM, Pourjavad E, Mayorga RV. An integrated fuzzy MCDM approach to improve sustainable consumption and production trends in supply chain. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 2018;16:99-109.
  13. Zhou P, Ang B, Poh K. Decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling: An update. Energy. 2006;31(14):2604-22.
  14. Saaty TL. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of mathematical psychology. 1977;15(3):234-81.
  15. Senol A, Bilgin M, Baslioglu B, Vakili-Nezhaad G. Modeling phase equilibria of ternary systems (water+ formic acid+ ester or alcohol) through UNIFAC-original, SERLAS, NRTL, NRTL-modified, and three-suffix Margules: Parameter estimation using genetic algorithm. Fluid Phase Equilibria. 2016;429:254-65.
  16. Fang J, Zheng T, Wu Z, Wu L, Xie Q, Xia F, et al. Liquid–Liquid Equilibrium for Systems Containing Epoxidized Oils, Formic Acid, and Water: Experimental and Modeling. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society. 2019;96(8):955-65.
  17. Mahdi T, Ahmad A, Nasef MM, Ripin A. State-of-the-art technologies for separation of azeotropic mixtures. Separation & Purification Reviews. 2015;44(4):308-30.
  18. Kazi FK, Patel AD, Serrano-Ruiz JC, Dumesic JA, Anex RP. Techno-economic analysis of dimethylfuran (DMF) and hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) production from pure fructose in catalytic processes. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2011;169(1):329-38.
  19. Almohamadi H, Alamoudi M, Ahmed U, Shamsuddin R, Smith K. Producing hydrocarbon fuel from the plastic waste: Techno-economic analysis. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2021:1-9.
  20. Quader MA, Rufford TE, Smart S. Modeling and cost analysis of helium recovery using combined-membrane process configurations. Separation and Purification Technology. 2020;236:116269.
  21. Alipour S, Karimi A, Savari C. Techno-economic analysis of small scale electricity generation from the lignocellulosic biomass. Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering. 2018;52(2):193-200.
  22. Heo HY, Heo S, Lee JH. Comparative techno-economic analysis of transesterification technologies for microalgal biodiesel production. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2019;58(40):18772-9.
  23. He J, Liu M, Huang K, Walker TW, Maravelias CT, Dumesic JA, et al. Production of levoglucosenone and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural from cellulose in polar aprotic solvent–water mixtures. Green Chemistry. 2017;19(15):3642-53.
  24. Turton R, Bailie RC, Whiting WB, Shaeiwitz JA. Analysis, synthesis and design of chemical processes: Pearson Education; 2008.
  25. Peters MS, Timmerhaus KD, West RE. Plant design and economics for chemical engineers: McGraw-Hill New York; 2003.
  26. Sinnott R, Towler G. Chemical engineering design: SI Edition: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2019.
  27. The Chemical Engineering Plant Cost Index 2019.
  28. Wang W, Niu M, Hou Y, Wu W, Liu Z, Liu Q, et al. Catalytic conversion of biomass-derived carbohydrates to formic acid using molecular oxygen. Green chemistry. 2014;16(5):2614-8.
  29. Promentilla MA, Aviso K, Lucas RI, Razon L, Tan R. Teaching Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in undergraduate chemical engineering courses. Education for Chemical Engineers. 2018;23:34-41.
  30. Timedjeghdine M, Hasseine A, Binous H, Bacha O, Attarakih M. Liquid–liquid equilibrium data for water+ formic acid+ solvent (butyl acetate, ethyl acetate, and isoamyl alcohol) at T= 291.15 K. Fluid Phase Equilibria. 2016;415:51-7
  31. Wannachod T, Hronec M, Soták T, Fulajtárová K, Pancharoen U, Nootong K. Influence of salt concentration on solubility and tie-line data for the system: Formic acid+ n-butanol+ water. Separation Science and Technology. 2018;53(6):990-8.
  32. Gilani HG, Asan S. Liquid–liquid equilibrium data for systems containing of formic acid, water, and primary normal alcohols at T= 298.2 K. Fluid Phase Equilibria. 2013;354:24-8.
  33. Bilgin M, Birman İ. Liquid phase equilibria of (water+ formic acid+ diethyl carbonate or diethyl malonate or diethyl fumarate) ternary systems at 298.15 K and atmospheric pressure. Fluid phase equilibria. 2011;302(1-2):249-53.
  34. Gilani HG, Noury S, Asan S. Phase equilibrium data for aqueous solutions of formic acid with 2-ethyl-1-hexanol at T=(298.2, 308.2, 318.2, and 328.2) K. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2013;30(6):1289-94.
  35. Demirel Ç, Çehreli S. Phase equilibrium of (water+ formic or acetic acid+ ethyl heptanoate) ternary liquid systems at different temperatures. Fluid Phase Equilibria. 2013;356:71-7.
Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering
Volume 56, Issue 1
June 2022
Pages 105-121

  • Receive Date 08 December 2021
  • Revise Date 20 January 2022
  • Accept Date 26 January 2022